A note to self: good process/bad process
John Cutler has been posting some supremely interesting content on LinkedIn recently, and I felt I had to save it somewhere for finding it more easily later. This is one is about attributes of good and bad process:
Good Process
- Encourages mindfulness.
- Flexible to local concerns.
- Adaptable, frequently challenged/improved.
- Mostly "pulled" because it is valuable.
- Core principles understood.
- Encourages conversations/collaboration.
- Co-created/designed with "users."
- Value to all participants.
- Increases confidence in outcomes.
- Distilled to core "job" (lightweight).
- Achieves desired consistency with minimal impact on resiliency. Improves global outcomes.
- Delivers value to end-customers.
- Guide/tool/navigate/remind.
- Enhances trust/safety.
Bad Process
- Encourages mindlessness.
- Inflexible to local concerns.
- Set in stone. "Just because..."
- Mostly "pushed" onto participants.
- Automatic/forced adherence.
- Reduces quality/quantity of conversations.
- Designed in vacuum and imposed.
- One-sided value.
- Detached from outcomes.
- Burdened by many jobs/concerns.
- Achieves consistency to the detriment of global outcomes/long-term resilience.
- Disconnected from customer value.
- Control/direct.
- Trust proxy, safety proxy.