A note to self: good process/bad process

John Cutler has been posting some supremely interesting content on LinkedIn recently, and I felt I had to save it somewhere for finding it more easily later. This is one is about attributes of good and bad process:

Good Process

  • Encourages mindfulness.
  • Flexible to local concerns.
  • Adaptable, frequently challenged/improved.
  • Mostly "pulled" because it is valuable.
  • Core principles understood.
  • Encourages conversations/collaboration.
  • Co-created/designed with "users."
  • Value to all participants.
  • Increases confidence in outcomes.
  • Distilled to core "job" (lightweight).
  • Achieves desired consistency with minimal impact on resiliency. Improves global outcomes.
  • Delivers value to end-customers.
  • Guide/tool/navigate/remind.
  • Enhances trust/safety.

Bad Process

  • Encourages mindlessness.
  • Inflexible to local concerns.
  • Set in stone. "Just because..."
  • Mostly "pushed" onto participants.
  • Automatic/forced adherence.
  • Reduces quality/quantity of conversations.
  • Designed in vacuum and imposed.
  • One-sided value.
  • Detached from outcomes.
  • Burdened by many jobs/concerns.
  • Achieves consistency to the detriment of global outcomes/long-term resilience.
  • Disconnected from customer value.
  • Control/direct.
  • Trust proxy, safety proxy.

Popular posts

Mirth: recover space when mirthdb grows out of control

On Quantity

Buffett on bad news